DIAGRAMME DE COMPOSANT UML2 PDF
Modélisation UML: Les différents types de diagramme Les diagrammes de composants décrivent les composants physiques et l’architecture. Ces diagrammes sont tous réalisés à partir du besoin des utilisateurs et peuvent Sur quel matériel chacun des composants sera installé?. A UML 2 deployment diagram depicts a static view of the run-time configuration of processing nodes and the components that run on those nodes. In other.
|Published (Last):||1 June 2008|
|PDF File Size:||10.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Concise UML 2 deployment diagram.
I may have chosen to apply the notation in “non-standard” ways. Do you intend to take a fat-client approach where the business logic is contained in a desktop application or a thin-client approach where business logic is deployed to an application server? The unified modeling language reference manual james rumbaugh, ivar jacobson, grady booch. When determining how to model the deployment architecture for a system, regardless of the artifacts chosen, I will typically:.
The notation used in these diagrams, particularly the hand drawn ones, may not conform perfectly to the current version of the UML for one or more of reasons:.
To determine whether you need to create a deployment model, ask yourself this: In my opinion the deployment properties is superfluous as this is the type of information that is contained in the actual deployment specification file at run time.
Translations Japanese Disclaimer The notation used in these diagrams, particularly the dizgramme drawn ones, may not conform perfectly to the current version of the UML for one or more of reasons: How do you intend to monitor the system once it has been deployed?
The ApplicationServer node contains EJBContainer a software node which in turn contains three software components, a deployment specification, and a software artifact. Software elements are now simply listed by their physical filenames, information that developers are very likely to be interested in, and thus a more compact diagram is possible.
Xomposant important, practice has shown that deployment modeling is well worth it. Although these diagrams were thoroughly reviewed for the book, and have been reviewed by thousands of people online since then, an error may have gotten past of us. Distribute software to nodes. Will your application have two tiers, three tiers, or more?
Outil UML : Diagrammes de déploiement
A better example is shown in Figure 2. I never draw deployment diagrams following the style show in Figure 1except when I’m writing about deployment modeling, because in my opinion this notation is visually wasteful. Scribd is the worlds largest social reading and publishing site. Another difference is that the concise version shows less details, not as many tagged values are shown as this information can be captured in either supporting documentation, configuration files, or source code.
Identify the distribution architecture. In unified modeling language uml, a component diagram depicts how components are wired together to form larger components or software systems. I may have gotten it wrong in the first place.
Diagramme global dinteraction interaction overview diagram. Both versions of the deployment diagrams indicate the software that is deployed on each node, critical information for anyone involved in development, installation, or operation of the system.
UML 2 Deployment Diagrams: An Agile Introduction
If you’re really concerned about the nuances of “official” UML notation then read the current version of the UML specification. Your distribution strategy will define the general type of nodes you will have, but not the exact details. The unified modeling language reference manual temida. An agile modeler is more interested in created models which communicate effectively than in conforming to notation rules set by a committee.
Gabays uml 2 analyse et conception pdf home ebooks.
Diagramme de temps — Wikipédia
As compozant, it depends on your goals. Deployment models force you to think about important deployment issues long before you must deliver the actual system.
When hml2 how to model the deployment architecture for a system, regardless of the artifacts chosen, I will typically: Very often less-detailed network diagramswhich are arguably deployment diagrams with extensive use of visual stereotypes, are a better option.
Remember, agile models don’t need to be perfect, they need to be just barely good enough.